"A well-paid STEM nerd can say the true things that a man with tenure from an Ivy cannot. Not because the STEM nerd is braver"...similarly, within a corporation a b-to-b sales rep who is at 170% of quota will be a lot bolder in his opinions about corporate political issues and people than will someone whose contribution is not quantifiably measurable.
GPT-speak aside, makes sense. Disagree that they could reverse the migration "at any time", reputations are harder to build than to lose, but kind of a moot point given the political angle.
"A well-paid STEM nerd can say the true things that a man with tenure from an Ivy cannot. Not because the STEM nerd is braver"...similarly, within a corporation a b-to-b sales rep who is at 170% of quota will be a lot bolder in his opinions about corporate political issues and people than will someone whose contribution is not quantifiably measurable.
GPT-speak aside, makes sense. Disagree that they could reverse the migration "at any time", reputations are harder to build than to lose, but kind of a moot point given the political angle.
I don't use GPT. It's too "agreeable".
Fair enough. It's more a comment on style than substance on that front anyway. Democratization of rhetoric up to a point.